Assessment 2 Outline
Subject- Assessment 2 Outline
The assessment focus upon a ‘fish’dish. You are to write a 1000-word standard operational procedure (SOP) for a vegetable risotto dish that is topped with pan fried seabass. This SOP should be unambiguous and be easy to follow for professionally trained chefs. Indicative content:
- Recipe ingredients for 2 portions
- Method for production
- Equipment and utensils required
- Highlight food safety good practices and Critical Control Points (CCPs)
- List the culinary skills required to execute the dishes
Marking Criteria:
|
CONTENT
|
|
30-22 |
21-15 |
14-8 |
7-0 |
|
· The content is clearly related to the area of study · There should be a comprehensive knowledge and understanding of major disciplines with areas of specialisation in depth, which must be applied to practice. · The content demonstrates originality and creativity · The assessment guidelines have been followed |
30 |
Integration of knowledge clearly applied and relevant to practice. Evidence of originality and creativity. Has followed the assessment guidelines. |
Addresses the aims of the study. Clearly applied to practice. There is evidence of some originality and creativity. Has followed the assessment guidelines.
|
Not all of the aims of the study are addressed. Is applied to practice. Has followed the assessment guidelines. |
Limited relevance to the area of study and practice. Has not followed the assessment guidelines. |
|
LEVEL OF ANALYSIS |
|
30-22 |
21-15 |
14-8 |
7-0 |
|
· There should be clear synthesis towards a given purpose and design of novel solutions · Evidence of reflection as appropriate |
30 |
Able to identify the components of the study clearly. Able to make constructive conclusions. |
Identifies the key issues. Evidence of reflection is present. |
Attempts to identify key issues. Attempts to identify strengths and weaknesses.
|
Wholly descriptive. Not relevant to the area of study. No attempts made at identifying strengths and weaknesses. |
|
APPLICATION:
|
|
20-16 |
15-11 |
10-6 |
5-0 |
|
· Document is well presented organised and clearly structured · There is a logical sequence to the work |
20 |
Well presented. Good organisation and structure.
|
Attention has been paid to the presentation, organisation and structure
|
An attempt has been made at the presentation, organisation and structure of the study.
|
Poorly presented, organised and structured.
|
|
CLARITY OF EXPRESSION |
|
20-16 |
15-11 |
10-6 |
5-0 |
|
· The piece of work must be written in a clear, articulate and fluent manner · Accurate in spelling and grammar. |
20 |
Articulate and fluent. Good spelling and grammar.
|
Meaning clear. Parts of the study demonstrate fluency. Spelling/and or grammar needs improvement. |
Meaning is clear. Spelling, grammar and proof reading requires improvement. |
Vague, does not get to the point. Poor spelling and grammar. Proof reading is needed.
|
