ITC505 | MEASURABLE ORGANISATIONAL VALUE

ITC505 | MEASURABLE ORGANISATIONAL VALUE | PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Computer Science

Art One

MOV – Measurable Organisational Value.

(This is the goal of the project and is utilised to define the value that your team project will bring to your client)

Identify the desired area of impact – Rank the following areas in terms of importance: Strategy / Customer / financial/operational/social
With reference to your project, identify one or two of the following types of value:
Better – is improving quality important to your client? o Faster – does your client want to increase efficiency? o Cheaper – is cutting costs important?

o Do more – does your client want to continue its growth?

Develop an appropriate metric – this sets the target and expectation of all the stakeholders. It is important to determine a quantitative target that needs to be expressed as a metric in terms of an increase or decrease of money.
Determine the timeframe for achieving the MOV – ask yourselves, when do we want to achieve this target metric?
SUMMARISE THE MOV IN A CLEAR CONCISE STATEMENT OR TABLE

(Note: the MOV should inform everyone what the project will achieve, not how it will be achieved. It should also focus on the organisation, not on the technology that will be used to build or support the information system).

Part Two:

Define Scope and produce a Scope Management Plan

Define the scope of the project and detail how the scope will be managed.

Provide a list of Resources

Identify and detail the resources for the project using MS Project where appropriate, including:

- People (and their roles), plus any extra personnel that is required for the project.

ORDER NOW

Technology – any hardware, network and software needs to support the team and your client.
Facilities – where will most of the teamwork be situated?
Other – for example, travel, training etc.

Part Three:

Using MS Project, develop a schedule using a high level Work Breakdown Structure (WBS). It should include:

Milestones for each phase and deliverable

This will tell everyone associated with the project that the phase or deliverable was completed satisfactorily.

Activities / Tasks

Define a set of activities / tasks that must be completed to produce each deliverable. Resource Assignments
Assign people and resources to each individual activity.

Estimates for Each Activity / Task

Develop a time estimate for each task or activity to be completed.

Budget

Create a time-phased budget using bottom-up estimating. Be sure to include direct costs listed in Part two and add 20% for fringe. State all assumptions and constraints you have used when creating your budget. State how confident you are in your estimates and what would make you more confident.

Students must submit screenshots of MS Project file as a part of the assessment submission.

Part Four:

Project Risk Analysis and Plan

Document any assumptions you have made about the project
Using the Risk Identification Framework as a basis, identify five risks to the project – one for each of the five phases of the methodology.
Analyse these risks, assign a risk to an appropriate member, and describe a strategy for the management of each specific risk.

Part Five:

Quality Management Plan. It should include:

A short statement that reflects your team’s philosophy or objective for ensuring that you deliver a quality system to your client.
Develop and describe the following that your project team could implement to ensure quality; o A set of verification activities

o A set of validation activities

Part Six: 550 words

Closure and Evaluation Researching for the closure checklist and project evaluation

To prepare for this task, you will be required to provide an annotated bibliography.

Write an Annotated Bibliography for three (3) relevant texts or readings around project evaluation. The Annotated Bibliography is a critical examination of the most relevant, recent and scholarly research on the topic area that is not just a summary of the articles you have read.

You will submit this as an appendix to your project evaluation documentation.

Ensure that the AB submitted by you is your own work and has not been submitted elsewhere and comply with the University’s requirements for academic integrity

Develop a closure checklist that the project team will use to ensure that the project has been closed properly.

Develop a project evaluation –outline and discuss how your project’s MOV will be evaluated.

Submit your assignment online via Turnitin in the nominated class. Turnitin details for the individual classes would be provided on Interact2.

Marking criteria

Criterion

High Distinction

Distinction

Credit

Pass

Fail

Provides an

The MOV illustrates

The MOV

The MOV fails to

MOV and

the student’s

the student’s detailed

illustrates the

cover one or more

identifies the

detailed

consideration of the

student’s

specified project

target and

consideration of the

target and an attempt

generalised

Requirements.

expectations of

target and a

at analysis of the

consideration of

all stakeholders

thorough analysis of

expectations of all

the target and an

the target;

in a suitable

the expectations of

stakeholders is

attempt at analysis

however analysis

format.

All stakeholders.

Evident.

of the expectations

of the

(15 Marks)

of most

expectations of

The format is

The format is logical

stakeholders is

all stakeholders is

logical, clear and

and appropriate to the

Evident.

Not clear.

Well-structured.

information

Presented.

The format is

suitable to the

information

Presented.

Utilising MS

Evidence of expertly

Correctly utilising

Key resources are

Key resources

Project, provides

utilising MS Project

MS Project to

correctly

have not been

a list of resources

to create a

to create a list of all

provide a list

identified and

Identified.

associated with

comprehensive list

resources required for

which identifies

Documented.

the project –

of resources,

the project;

most of the

including

demonstrating in-

demonstrating

resources required

reference to

depth analysis of the

analysis of the

for the project;

people,

Project’s needs.

some evidence of

technology, and

analysis of project

facilities and

Needs.

associated costs

(10 Marks)

Produces a

Consistent

Well written with

Well written but

Writing is not of

Scope

application of

some demonstration

demonstration of

lacks acceptable

an acceptable

Management

industry standard

of industry standard

academic standard

Formatting.

Standard.

Plan (SCM).

language and

(10 Marks)

Formatting.

Utilising MS

Demonstrates high

Demonstrates

The WBS design

Project –

level project

competent

essential

minimal

fails to correctly

evidences the

management skills,

management

address one or

processes

integrating and

applying project

skills and needs

more essential

involved with a

applying project

management tools in

management tools

some

project

WBS, including

management tools in

meaningful and

in meaningful and

improvement in

Requirements.

Budget.

meaningful and

purposeful ways

applying project

(20 Marks)

purposeful ways

towards completion

towards

management

towards completion

of the WBS design,

completion of the

tools in

of WBS design,

correctly addresses

WBS design.

meaningful and

correctly and

the all project

Essential project

purposeful ways

comprehensively

Requirements.

requirements

towards

addressing all

Addressed.

completion of

project

WBS. Not all

Requirements.

project

requirements are

clearly

Addressed.

Provides a

All steps in project

Evidence that key

Key steps in

One or more key

project risk

risk analysis and

steps in project risk

project risk

steps in project

analysis and plan

alternate strategies

analysis and

risk analysis and

using the risk

are comprehensively

are clearly discussed

alternate strategies

alternate

identification

discussed and

and presented in the

are discussed and

strategies are

strategies are not

framework as a

presented in the

context of the project,

presented in the

accurately

Presented.

basis for

context of the

with reference to the

context of the

Presented.

discussing

project, with

framework to validate

project, with some

Minimal

Criterion	High Distinction	Distinction	Credit	Pass	Fail
alternate	evidence of	The alternatives.	linkages back to	reference to
strategies for the	thorough		the framework to	framework in the
management of	consideration of the		validate the	discussion
Such risks.	framework to		Alternatives.	Presented.
(15 Marks)	validate the
	Alternatives.

Produces a	All required project	All required project	All required	Most required	Multiple project
quality	steps are correctly	steps are correctly	project steps are	project steps are	steps are missing
management	identified and	identified and are	correctly identified	correctly	or not applied to
plan which	appropriately	applied to the	and are applied to	identified and	the selected
includes a	contextualised for	selected project with	the selected	applied to the	Project.
statement about	The selected project.	some	Project.	Selected project.
the team’s		Contextualisation.
philosophy and
verification and
validation
Activities.
(10 Marks)
A closure	The closure	The closure checklist	The closure	The closure	The closure
checklist is	checklist is detailed,	is detailed, and has	checklist has been	checklist has	checklist has not
produced	and has been used	been used accurately	used appropriately	been used to	been addressed
alongside the	accurately to close	To close the project.	to close the project,	close the project,	adequately, the
development of a	The project. The	The evaluation has	and the evaluation	and the	evaluation is
project	evaluation has been	been well	has been	evaluation has	lacking detail and
evaluation that is	professionally	documented and is	adequately	been addressed	is not evidenced
evidenced by	documented and is	evidenced by	documented and is	and is evidenced	By research.
Research.	evidenced by	Research.	evidenced by	By research.
(10 marks)	Research.		Research.
Referencing of	All written evidence	All written	All written	All written	No apparent
sources (APA	is professionally	information is good	information is	content is loosely	logical order of
6th end citation)	communicated using	with appropriate	generally well	connected, and	written content,
to reinforce	Correct referencing.	referencing	organised but more	there is	and there is a lack
Findings.			clarity of	ineffective use of	Of referencing.
(10 marks)			communication is	Referencing.
			required in terms
			Of referencing.

ITC505|Measurable Organizational Value and Project Management|

This assignment comprises of six parts. The first part involves writing a project on the MOV (Measurable Organizational Value). In the second part, the learner is required to define the scope and develop a scope management plan. The third part comprises of the development of schedule through the utilization of the high level of WBS (Work Breakdown structure). The part four entails to the project on risk analysis and planning. Part five requires the development of quality management plan. The last part six involves the closure and also evaluation for which learner has to write annotated bibliography from three of the relevant texts or readings. The submission of the final document will be done online through Turnitin.

Every management student has to study the measurable organizational value and project management. Since it is a practical subject, the learners are given endless projects on varied topics of the subject. But students face lots of challenges while writing the subject projects. So they start searching for the online tutoring company which provides the ITC505|Measurable Organizational Value and Project Management| assignment help. Our project assistance company is the most trusted among the learners worldwide for getting their subject assignments solved. Our experts first assess the individualized needs of the learners and then devise the tailor made and prominent solutions that fetch top grades. Contact our team today

ITC505 | MEASURABLE ORGANISATIONAL VALUE | PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Download Solution

Prices

1000 words / 3 pages - 40 AUD | 20 Pounds

2000 words / 6 pages - 80 AUD | 40 Pounds